Brian Reavill 2 for 1 – The Advantage System / The High Strike Rate System

THE ADVANTAGE SYSTEM – Over the trial period, this method produced a LEVEL STAKE PROFIT OF 109.03 POINTS which equates to A CLEAR PROFIT OF £5451.50 TO £50 LEVEL STAKES. This is a system advertised by Brian Reavill, who has been a system’s analyst since the 1970’s. He previously wrote the Systems page for the Raceform Handicap Book under the Pen Name “Abacus”. The Advantage System has been trialled over a 7-month period. Over the trial period there were 138 selections of which 51 were winners. This produced a LEVEL STAKE PROFIT OF 109.03 POINTS which equates to A CLEAR PROFIT OF £5451.50 TO £50 LEVEL STAKES. Reavill personally uses The Daily Mail to operate this method but advises that the rules can be adapted for use with any newspaper or even the Racing Post online. Although the win rate is not excessive at 37%, it does involve average starting prices at just under 4/1. Each way backers may be interested to know that of the 87 losing bets, 40 of these were placed second or third at an average Starting Price of just under 11/2. The system produces around 4 to 5 selections a week covering all types of racing, including Flat, National Hunt and All-Weather.

THE HIGH STRIKE RATE SYSTEM – In the period from January 1st to December 9th, this Method has produced an incredible 81 winners from 99 selections. That’s an Incredible Strike Rate of over 80% and can I stress that these are Win Bets and Not Place Bets. This high strike rate has also been consistent over previous years, with a Strike Rate of 85% over the previous year. Reavill takes advantage of the incredible winning strike rate by involving multiple betting to maximise profits, mostly with doubles although you can move on to trebles, four timers etc, with the potential to achieve high profits. This method has regular long winning runs and very limited losing runs. In the past the system has produced a run of 12 or more consecutive winners four times! Have you ever had winning runs like that?